Hi All, We used to work with IBM MQ so far in our environment and currently in the process of migrating to ActiveMQ Classic(5.x). With IBM MQ, we used to create the MQ objects well in advance before handing over to application teams. With ActiveMQ, it was noticed that the broker has the ability to auto-create the queues and topics whenever the applications send a request for access. Also, it was noticed that there is a possibility for multiple objects being created corresponding to a single destination object. For example, with auto-creation allowed at one of our DEV broker, based on transactions from the applications, one of the destination queue objects "Q01.REPLY" was auto-created four times with multiple names "Q01.REPLY", "q01.reply", "queue://Q01.REPLY" and "queue://queue://Q01.REPLY". The business applications obviously cannot work properly with these four different queue objects because they all need to publish and consume from the queue "Q01.REPLY" only.
In this regard, can any of you please let me know what is the best practice to be used for controlling the creation of ActiveMQ objects properly so that the above mentioned scenario is effectively addressed? Thanks & Regards, * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Alban Soosai Nayagam Senior Middleware Engineer - MIDDLEWARE-TR Thomson Reuters C 1-437-241-6539 Escalation<https://trten.sharepoint.com/sites/intr-ihn-service-portfolio/SitePages/IHN-Contact-%26-Escalation(1).aspx> This e-mail is for the sole use of the intended recipient and contains information that may be privileged and/or confidential. If you are not an intended recipient, please notify the sender by return e-mail and delete this e-mail and any attachments. Certain required legal entity disclosures can be accessed on our website: https://www.thomsonreuters.com/en/resources/disclosures.html