IMHO, most companies don't want traces of AppFuse in their applications, so I think this is a bad idea.
Sorry, we won't be making this change. Matt On 3/14/07, tibi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
ha you are just moving the other way ;) i would reather see that the appfuse tables are easaly found in a database with lots of tables. offcourse there is a way around with hiberante but why make live difficult. if the 3 tables ware named appfuse_* than no problem would accure. if database would have namespaces you would have used those (like packages) tibi Matt Raible wrote: > Are you using Hibernate? If so, there's a NamingStrategy feature you > can use to add your own prefixes. > > I'm considering renaming "app_user" to "user" to be more standard. > Since these names can be changed, it seems to make sense, no? > > Matt > > On 3/14/07, tibi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> hi matt and others, >> >> i use appfuse on an existing database structure. appfuse uses 3 tables. >> i would like to see that the naming off these tables would be kind of >> unique (like appfuse_rol, appfuse_user_rol) >> >> just an idea... >> >> ciao, >> >> tibi >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- http://raibledesigns.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
