Hi Nico,
Maybe i ask in this way... which one is better to be integrated into
appfuse?
Best regards,
Jonathan
Nicolas Modrzyk wrote:
Hi Jonathan,
There is a very nice newbie guide archive for OpenWfe at the following
place:
http://web.archive.org/web/20060207025750/web.openwfe.org/display/openwfe/Vamsee's+Newbie+Guide
In Magnolia, only 4 openwfe modules are needed:
- openwfe-applic: application classes
- openwfe-embed: clases related to run the embedeed version of the
engine (as opposed to standalone)
- openwfe-engine: the core classes of the engines
- openwfe-worklist: related to storing and handling items for list of
flow items.
In Magnolia, the persistence (through openwfe-jcr) was also developed,
meaning adding the required Java Content Repository support for
storage of workflow items and other data.
If OpenWFE may not be the only engine suited for workflow. JBPM, or
Bonita could also be integrated.
I was thinking about something a bit more generic ?
What do you think ?
Regards,
Nicolas,
On Apr 30, 2007, at 5:28 PM, Jonathan Tse wrote:
Hi Niko,
Do you mind giving us some very brief information (like the
technologies, architectures) of OpenWFE? It seems that OpenWFE got
many modules , how many of them have you integrated to Magnolia?
Maybe if we have more information/idea to get started, the community
will be more involved.
Best regards,
Jonathan
Nicolas Modrzyk wrote:
Happy to hear it. Having much more experience with workflows than
with Appfuse, I'd be interested to get the feedback of developers
and users of Appfuse, and get a glimpse of what would be the sexier
way to do this, as well as the main tasks to make a smooth integration.
Niko,
On Apr 27, 2007, at 1:47 PM, Jonathan Tse wrote:
I personally welcome this kind of integration to appfuse. I am not
familar with openwfe but a richer set of feature will make appfuse
more attractive.
Jonathan
Nicolas Modrzyk wrote:
Hi list,
This a forward from a short mail with Matt:
Looking at all the progress and achievements done in Appfuse and its
light version, I was thinking more and more about some ways of
enabling
the integration of a workflow engine from the start.
I have been working with John Mettraux for some time now and
maybe it be
really nice to have the embedded version of his Openwfe engine so
any
framework could actually start using some BPM solution really
quickly.
I have also been working with Tom Bayens (JBPM) a bit so there
could be
also some choice at this level.
I've integrated an embedded version of Openwfe
(http://www.openwfe.org) into the Magnolia CMS
(http://www.magnolia.info)
I'd say it's a real enabler for BPM solutions within Magnolia and
I'd say it'd be a really nice feature to integrate in appfuse.
Some quick flows that can be integrated are:
- review/notification/approval
- time-based publishing (agreed this can be done using schedulers
as well)
- tasks and delegates for users in a site (including inbox and
actions)
Some other thoughts on this ?
Niko,
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
