mraible wrote: > > The reason for showing both methods is probably because AppFuse > supports jMock out of the box, but the author who wrote this tutorial > liked EasyMock better. The AMP plugin generates jMock tests by default > for the ManagerTests. Maybe we should make it an option to generate > EasyMock tests instead? This probably wouldn't be too hard to add. >
Ok, thanks for the explanation. I don't really have an opinion because for me both tools are new. :) I did notice though that EasyMock looked cleaner. Philip -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/jMock-v.s.-EasyMock--tf3701270s2369.html#a10811607 Sent from the AppFuse - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
