forgot to add, i also have to take the non-nullable constraint off my
@ManyToOne(s). which is probably redundant anyway, i guess all that
mappedBy attribute does is enforce non-nullability on the specified field.
???
p7k wrote:
>
> pardon the n00biness,
>
> i think i have a need to map this object model with hibernate.
> i tried to make both relationships {Project-Solution} and {Solution-Route}
> bidirectional by using the following annotations, however it fails:
>
> class Project {
> @OneToMany(targetEntity = Solution.class, mappedBy = "project",
> cascade = CascadeType.ALL)
>
> @org.hibernate.annotations.Cascade(value=org.hibernate.annotations.CascadeType.DELETE_ORPHAN)
> Set<Solution> solutions;
> }
>
> class Solution {
> @OneToMany(targetEntity = Route.class, mappedBy = "solution", cascade
> = CascadeType.ALL)
>
> @org.hibernate.annotations.Cascade(value=org.hibernate.annotations.CascadeType.DELETE_ORPHAN)
> Set<Route> routes;
>
> @ManyToOne(targetEntity = Project.class) @JoinColumn(nullable =
> false)
> Project project;
> }
>
> class Route {
> @ManyToOne(targetEntity = Solution.class) @JoinColumn(nullable =
> false)
> Solution solution;
> }
>
>
> i get parent/child foreign key constraint violations, unless i remove the
> mappedBy annotation attribute (equivalent to <inverse> in xml)
>
> Am i wrong conceptually, is there a better way to map this hierarchy, am i
> too stuck in the object-oriented thinking?
>
> Removing the mappedBy attribute fixes the problem and i would think that
> navigation from Route to Solution and Solution to Project should still be
> possible this way.
>
> I would love to hear your thoughts. Thank you.
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/hibernate-hierarchy-mapping-question-tf4351764s2369.html#a12400062
Sent from the AppFuse - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]