Due to use of JSF Expression Language(EL) Seam saves a lot of xml configuration(or annotation?). Compared to Spring you are unware of data binding, entity bean construction etc in Seam. All these are handled by EL. Meanwhile Seam-Gen has provided a java version of Ruby on Rails. Good for rapid project start.
That is my 2 cents and I am still reading book on Seam. Not sure if we should have Seam versoin of AppFuse. mraible wrote: > > I think it's a good choice if you want to use JSF and EJB3. > > Matt > > On 8/22/07, André Faria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Hi Everybody, >> >> I would like to know what is your opnion about JBoss Seam... >> Do you guys think that it can be a better choice than the Spring + >> Struts2? Why? >> >> Regards, >> André Faria from Brazil >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> > > > -- > http://raibledesigns.com > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/JBoss-Seam-tf4314341s2369.html#a12902528 Sent from the AppFuse - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
