Hi Olivier, 

Thanks for quick reply. I understand now why files are present in past (Archiva 
1.3) ... when plugins have been deployed.

I will correct problem manually and work to a consumer.

Best Regards.
-----Message d'origine-----
De : Olivier Lamy [mailto:ol...@apache.org] 
Envoyé : lundi 17 février 2014 00:09
À : users@archiva.apache.org
Objet : Re: Archiva 1.4-M4 and maven-metadata.xml generation for pluginGroups 
usage

On 16 February 2014 03:44, ALIX LOURME <alix.lou...@mpsa.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In our company we are using (the great tool !) Archiva, in version 1.4-M4.
> We have some internal plugins, the usage by prefix is resolved with 
> "pluginGroups" process defined in maven settings.xml.
>
> After some groupId/artifactId changes on these company plugins, the 
> maven-metadata.xml files have been deleted in plugins directory in our 
> internal repository under archiva, to re-start on a "clean" situation.
>
> After a complete scan/index, I can see maven-metadata.xml of plugins/version 
> are correctly generated (eg : com.company.plugins.myPlugin and 
> com.company.plugins.myPlugin.versionXYY), but NOT in plugins root directory 
> (eg : com.company.plugins).
>
> So the repository directory corresponding to the settings.xml pluginsGroup 
> configuration doesn't have maven-metada.xml containing list of plugins.
> It affects Maven 2 (v2.2.1) usage ... because this version is not very 
> transigent when metadata are not exist in this plugin prefix resolution case 
> (compared to maven 3.1).
>
> So my question : Archiva 1.4-M4 is not supposed generate this "intermediary" 
> metadata automatically ? Or a specific configuration or consummer development 
> must be done ?

Those metadata file are generated/uploaded by Maven when you deploy
the plugin (and not by Archiva)
So Archiva is not supposed to do that.
Writing a consummer to repair that sounds a good idea.
For 1.4. and coming 2.0.x see documentation here:
http://archiva.apache.org/docs/1.4-M4/customising/writing-consumer.html
If the documentation is not complete or clear enough (which can be
possible :-) ), do not hesitate to ask questions.

> (I "suppose" this process was ok in Archiva 1.3, some intermediary metadata 
> are always present, generated before version migration).
>
> Thanks in advance for any advice.
> Best regards.
>
> Alix Lourme



-- 
Olivier Lamy
Ecetera: http://ecetera.com.au
http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy

Reply via email to