On Wednesday 28 April 2004 23:54, Justin Permar wrote: > I'm confused as to how avalon meta is different from > xdoclet. Why not just use xdoclet?
I am not the one behind the Meta package, but I think that it uses the xdoclet package to 'parse' the Javadocs, and then have its own 'serializers' to write the parsed information to either XML or 'serialized' format. > On a grander scope, there seem to be a number of avalon > tools that are essentially copies of tools that seem to be > industry standard elsewhere. Why is this? Most of what I think you are referring to are mainly wrappers around the 'standard', to suit our needs and not replacements. Niclas -- +---------//-------------------+ | http://www.bali.ac | | http://niclas.hedhman.org | +------//----------------------+ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
