"Stephen McConnell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb im Newsbeitrag news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Eike Stepper wrote:
> > in the first case all services seem to be resolved to the same component
> > and in the latter one they resolve to different components.
> > it seems to be a problem with the output only. the app would not
> > work at all if the BufferPool service would be backed by a ProtocolManager
> > implementation...
>
> This has me stumped!
>
> Could you post the generated xinfo files for BufferPool,
> ConnectionManager, ProtocolManager and SelectorManager?

here they are:

<type>
  <info>
    <name>DefaultBufferPool</name>
    <version>1.0.0</version>
    <lifestyle>singleton</lifestyle>
    <collection>hard</collection>
  </info>
  <services>
    <service type="de.escnet.net4j.util.BufferPool" version="1.0.0"/>
  </services>
</type>

<type>
  <info>
    <name>DefaultConnectionManager</name>
    <version>1.0.0</version>
    <lifestyle>singleton</lifestyle>
    <collection>hard</collection>
  </info>
  <services>
    <service type="de.escnet.net4j.transport.ConnectionManager" version="1.0.0"/>
  </services>
</type>

<type>
  <info>
    <name>DefaultSelectorManager</name>
    <version>1.0.0</version>
    <lifestyle>singleton</lifestyle>
    <collection>hard</collection>
  </info>
  <services>
    <service type="de.escnet.net4j.transport.SelectorManager" version="1.0.0"/>
  </services>
</type>

<type>
  <info>
    <name>DefaultProtocolManager</name>
    <version>1.0.0</version>
    <lifestyle>singleton</lifestyle>
    <collection>hard</collection>
  </info>
  <services>
    <service type="de.escnet.net4j.protocol.ProtocolManager" version="1.0.0"/>
  </services>
</type>






---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to