"Stephen McConnell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb im Newsbeitrag news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Eike Stepper wrote:
> > in the first case all services seem to be resolved to the same component
> > and in the latter one they resolve to different components.
> > it seems to be a problem with the output only. the app would not
> > work at all if the BufferPool service would be backed by a ProtocolManager
> > implementation...
>
> This has me stumped!
>
> Could you post the generated xinfo files for BufferPool,
> ConnectionManager, ProtocolManager and SelectorManager?
here they are:
<type>
<info>
<name>DefaultBufferPool</name>
<version>1.0.0</version>
<lifestyle>singleton</lifestyle>
<collection>hard</collection>
</info>
<services>
<service type="de.escnet.net4j.util.BufferPool" version="1.0.0"/>
</services>
</type>
<type>
<info>
<name>DefaultConnectionManager</name>
<version>1.0.0</version>
<lifestyle>singleton</lifestyle>
<collection>hard</collection>
</info>
<services>
<service type="de.escnet.net4j.transport.ConnectionManager" version="1.0.0"/>
</services>
</type>
<type>
<info>
<name>DefaultSelectorManager</name>
<version>1.0.0</version>
<lifestyle>singleton</lifestyle>
<collection>hard</collection>
</info>
<services>
<service type="de.escnet.net4j.transport.SelectorManager" version="1.0.0"/>
</services>
</type>
<type>
<info>
<name>DefaultProtocolManager</name>
<version>1.0.0</version>
<lifestyle>singleton</lifestyle>
<collection>hard</collection>
</info>
<services>
<service type="de.escnet.net4j.protocol.ProtocolManager" version="1.0.0"/>
</services>
</type>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]