David,

On Sun, 2005-11-13 at 08:21 +1100, David Wilson wrote:
> Bibliographic List members,
> 
>                       To let you know what has been happening -
> 
> Bruce D'Arcus has been lobbying senior Sun OpenOffice managers to get some 
> definite statement of support for our project and some idea of the scope of 
> work that they may be willing to undertake. We have asked that at a minimum 
> we need -
> 
> Sun to improve the infrastructure for bibliographic metadata and citations. 
> This involves changes at both the level of OpenDocument, which we started 
> last year with a citation proposal that was approved by the OD TC, but which 
> are as yet incomplete, and at the level of OOo infrastructure. (Bruce' 
> message 
> today shows that his is progressing)


This is good news.


> Sun to enhance OOo to make it easier for developers (including Sun!) to 
> innovate. This is the custom content access idea. ( At the moment, if you add 
> any custom data into a OOo save file, and open and close the file with an OOo 
> application your custom data will be removed. There needs to be a mechanism 
> by which developers and users can add and save custom data.)


Yes - but this should not be too difficult?


> The OOo bibliographic functions exposed via a plug-in API to make it really 
> easy for third-parties to plug-in in a consistent way. We have proposed, with 
> advice from industry experts (two of whom are working with us), that the 
> easiest and most forward-looking way to do this is to expose the ZOOM API via 
> UNO.
> 
> Once these are in place it will be much easier for volunteer developers to 
> build and attach the bibliographic applications that we need. 


It cannot come fast enough for me.  OOo/SO is a fantastic product but it
desperately needs this extra stuff.  People like me (in the alpha/beta
testing category) are waiting eagerly . .


> The answer we have received was that they now have to -
> 
> 1) work out a rough technical design for the involved areas,
> 2) get the resources from the involved teams to support (not implement) the 
> effort and 
> 3) have people with the will and ability to do grass-roots work.
> 
> My impression is that they support, in principle, our approach 
> and goals. We have to wait and see what resources can be scheduled for this 
> work and when.  


This is still great progress - good work!

Regards,

Phil.
-- 
Philip Rhoades

Pricom Pty Limited  (ACN 003 252 275  ABN 91 003 252 275)
GPO Box 3411
Sydney NSW      2001
Australia
Mobile:  +61:(0)411-185-652
Fax:     +61:(0)2-8221-9599
E-mail:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to