Buildbot is so much more flexible than Gitlab CI so we use Buildbot - especially since we deal with large frameworks in different languages (mostly C++, C#, Python, shell scripts) with their own build requirements. I'm not sure we could even implement our build flow in Gitlab CI.
On 9/16/2016 8:00 AM, users-requ...@buildbot.net wrote:
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2016 15:38:31 +0000 From: Pierre Tardy <tar...@gmail.com> To: Dan Kegel <d...@kegel.com> Cc: Ryan Schmidt <build...@ryandesign.com>, Buildbot <users@buildbot.net> Subject: Re: [us...@bb.net] buildbot 0.9.0 rc3 Message-ID: <caj+sove9_qcomjy0c9mbehmg+3tegodzcqqi9z5juqdlg0k...@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Well. That far is not that difficult. It just integrated github reporter api so that there is a link for each test of the matrix. There is no support for gitlab yet. I'm not sure there is such a demand for that as gitlab Ci looks already quite good (on paper..I never actually tried it) It won't be very difficult to implement as there are already many gitlab components in buildbot. Le jeu. 15 sept. 2016 00:14, Dan Kegel <d...@kegel.com> a ?crit :On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 2:36 PM, Pierre Tardy <tar...@gmail.com> wrote:buildbot travis is an experimental buildbot setup that focuses on havingtheUI directly in github or gerrit rather than in buildbot itself, this iswhyit might be a little bit confusing. People are supposed to be pointed at buildbot only when there is a failed build, and directly in the problematic page.Well, well, well. That's interesting. I had seen https://github.com/buildbot/buildbot_travis but hadn't realized it went that far. Do you have an example install of gitlab with a corresponding buildbot doing the build work? And how does this compare to using gitlab ci? Message
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ users mailing list users@buildbot.net https://lists.buildbot.net/mailman/listinfo/users
