On Mar 2, 2009, at 1:47 AM, Martijn Dashorst
<[email protected]> wrote:
I've read it, and have problems understanding what you mean by main
repository then?
Nowhere in Vic's message do I see a synchronization step where commits
end up in svn?
Vic created a wonderful script that synchs both ways. It's in SVN (or
Git for that matter) if you're interested in checking it out. We've
been using it for months while in incubator.
The discussion today is whether the main Git repository we direct
people to should be Jukka's or Github (most likely vic/buildr).
Assaf
Martijn
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 10:17 AM, Assaf Arkin <[email protected]>
wrote:
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 1:07 AM, Martijn Dashorst <[email protected]
wrote:
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 1:34 AM, Assaf Arkin <[email protected]>
wrote:
I'm with you in using Github as the main repository:
As an ASF Member I must protest against the direction that you are
taking this project. GitHub can not be used as the main repository
for
any ASF Project. The canonical resource for Apache project's code
must
be hosted on Apache hardware. Since the only repository that is
supported by Infrastructure is SVN, you'll have to maintain the
primary source for your project *in* SVN. Not somewhere else, not
bypassing ASF authorizations, not bypassing Apache policy.
Since when have we not made Buildr code available through SVN?
You're reading my comment sans context. You have to start with
Vic's email
to which I'm replying.
Assaf
Martijn
--
Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com
Apache Wicket 1.3.5 is released
Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.
