Hi Mat,
On Sep 15, 2009, at 9:05 AM, Mat Schaffer wrote:
On Sep 15, 2009, at 10:01 AM, Rhett Sutphin wrote:
I am still using the subproject approach. Actually, I've found
that I prefer it -- it lets me segment the test runs so that I can
easily execute just the server-side or just the client-side unit
tests.
That sounds great to me. Would you might posting an example that I
could work off of or let me know what I've got wrong in my buildfile?
I looked at your buildfile, but I didn't see anything wrong with it.
I've had issues with buildr's jtestr support in the past -- I spent a
while debugging it, but then I realized I could more easily switch to
using buildr's direct rspec support (which works great). Consider
that if it's an option for you. That said, my issues with buildr/
jtestr were (IIRC) with it not picking up / applying options
correctly. You don't seem to be passing any options, so it's probably
unrelated,
The project I was asking about is on is open source, so you can see
the whole thing if you like. The buildfile: https://ncisvn.nci.nih.gov/svn/psc/trunk/buildfile
. The psc:web module is the one that is tested two ways -- the
server-side code is tested in psc:web itself and the client-side code
is in the psc:web:js-spec subproject.
Rhett