I would keep it as 3rd-party extension for now. Give it time to mature and bring it in later if committers are ready to support + maintain it.
alex On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 7:00 AM, Daniel Spiewak <[email protected]> wrote: > Just to get the discussion started, I'm in favor of the third party > extension approach, but we could easily pull it in as an addon/ or even > lib/ > if there's enough serious interest. > > Daniel > > On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 4:08 AM, Antoine Toulme <[email protected] > >wrote: > > > Hi, > > at Intalio, we wrote a debian packaging extension. We'd like to > contribute > > to Buildr and I opened > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BUILDR-318for > > this. > > > > I was asked by Daniel to open a thread on this ml to discuss where this > > contribution should go to: > > -third party extension as it is now ? > > -an addon ? > > -or something part of lib ? (we have enough specs to qualify for it). > > > > Note that as of now you can take advantage of the code by forking: > > > > http://github.com/intalio/package_as_deb > > > > Thanks, > > > > Antoine > > >
