Yes, I know for the shell command thingy. If the ant plugin doesn't help, no need to get further down this route then.
Thanks! Antoine On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 09:29, Rhett Sutphin <[email protected]>wrote: > Hi, > > > On Jan 19, 2010, at 10:46 AM, Antoine Toulme wrote: > > A wild guess - I think it would be easier to find buildr. Right now, you >> have to make sure it is in the path. >> > > That's true. > > > Then, it would also be worthwhile to be able to specify which version of >> buildr you use for your project. >> > > You can do this with a shell command: > > $ buildr _1.3.3_ --version > Buildr 1.3.3 > $ buildr _1.3.5_ --version > Buildr 1.3.5 > $ buildr _3.9.0_ --version > /Library/Ruby/Site/1.8/rubygems.rb:827:in `report_activate_error': RubyGem > version error: buildr(1.3.3 not = 3.9.0) (Gem::LoadError) > from /Library/Ruby/Site/1.8/rubygems.rb:261:in `activate' > from /Library/Ruby/Site/1.8/rubygems.rb:68:in `gem' > from /usr/bin/buildr:18 > > However, I usually don't -- I have lots of builds for the same project > (trunk, current stable, nightly distributions for both, integration tests > for both) and it would be a pain to have to change all of them whenever I > switch buildr versions. Easier just to upgrade buildr on the system and be > done with it. > > > >> And finally ... well how do they do it for ant ? >> > > I have found the specific ant configuration process in hudson cumbersome > and always just used the default one (i.e., the one on the path). I'll > grant that it might be helpful if you have a large hudson deployment with > many projects, though. > > Thanks for the reply. > > Rhett > > > >> On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 08:39, Rhett Sutphin <[email protected] >> >wrote: >> >> Hi, >>> >>> >>> On Jan 19, 2010, at 10:17 AM, Antoine Toulme wrote: >>> >>> Anders, how about filing a bug to buildr for coding and documenting a >>> >>>> Hudson >>>> support ? >>>> >>>> I think quite a few people would have a use for it. >>>> >>>> The shell command might be good enough though. We also use it for our >>>> Hudson-based builds. >>>> >>>> >>> I also use shell commands to run buildr builds in hudson. I'm not sure >>> how >>> plugin would be better -- what are people thinking the benefits would be? >>> >>> Rhett >>> >>> >>> >>> Thanks, >>>> >>>> Antoine >>>> >>>> On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 01:43, Anders Janmyr <[email protected] >>>> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>> >>>> Ok, thats what I thought. >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Thanks for your help. >>>>> >>>>> Anders >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 10:06 AM, Martin Grotzke >>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi Anders, >>>>>> >>>>>> we have configured buildr as "Execute shell", with command: >>>>>> buildr clean test checkstyle:xml >>>>>> >>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>> Martin >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, 2010-01-19 at 09:20 +0100, Anders Janmyr wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi Martin, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> How are you using it? Are you running buildr as a system command or >>>>>>> are you calling the >>>>>>> command differently. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Can you mail me a sample configuration file? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Anders >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 9:16 AM, Martin Grotzke >>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> we're using hudson and it's working fine with buildr. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>>> Martin >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Tue, 2010-01-19 at 08:50 +0100, Anders Janmyr wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I am planning to use Buildr in a project which will use Java and >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> JRuby modules. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> We are planning to use Hudson as an integration server, but I >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> couldn't find any >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> support for Buildr with it. >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I know I can just run it as a normal script, but I am still >>>>>>>>> curious. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> What CI do you guys use when building with Buildr? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Regards >>>>>>>>> Anders >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> http://anders.janmyr.com/ >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>> >
