I want to compile a Java project which depends on the .class files
produced by compiling another project. Both projects use a custom
layout, which works fine, and both projects compile to their
target/classes directory; there are no artifacts, such as JAR files, and
I would like to avoid them if possible.
The following does not work:
define 'ATGDUST' do
compile.dependencies = ATG_DAS + COMMONS_CODEC + COMMONS_DBCP +
COMMONS_LANG + COMMONS_IO + COMMONS_POOL +
HSQLDB + DDLUTILS + JUNIT + LOG4J
end
define 'ATFramework' do
compile.dependencies = ATG_DAS + ATG_DPS + ATG_DSS + ATG_DCS +
COMMONS_LANG + COMMONS_COLLECTIONS + EASYMOCK + JUNIT
compile.with project('ProgiCommerce:ATGDUST')
end
The error is:
D:\dev\progicommerce\src>%JRUBY_HOME%\bin\jruby -S buildr
(in D:/dev/progicommerce/src, development)
D:/dev/progicommerce/src/buildfile:4 warning: already initialized
constant VERSION
D:/dev/progicommerce/src/buildfile:7 warning: already initialized
constant VERSION
Building ProgiCommerce
Compiling ProgiCommerce:ATGDUST into
D:/dev/progicommerce/src/ATGDUST/target/classes
...
11 warnings
Compiling ProgiCommerce:ATFramework into
D:/dev/progicommerce/src/ATFramework/target/classes
D:\dev\progicommerce\src\ATFramework\src\main\java\com\progiweb\testing\repository\AutoInitializingGSA.java:10:
cannot find symbol
symbol : class InitializingGSA
location: package atg.adapter.gsa
import atg.adapter.gsa.InitializingGSA;
^
...
44 errors
2 warnings
Buildr aborted!
?[31mRuntimeError : Failed to compile, see errors above?[0m
I confirmed by adding --trace that the ATGDUST/target/classes directory
does not appear in the compilation classpath of the ATFramework project.
I can successfully compile both projects I change the definition of the
ATFramework project to:
define 'ATFramework' do
compile.dependencies = ATG_DAS + ATG_DPS + ATG_DSS + ATG_DCS +
COMMONS_LANG + COMMONS_COLLECTIONS + EASYMOCK + JUNIT
compile.with project('ProgiCommerce:ATGDUST')._(:target, :main,
:classes)
end
I don't like it because I'm expressing a dependency in terms of physical
files and not in terms of projects, but at this stage I cannot find a
better way to do it. I feel however that I'm missing something and that
Buildr looks flexible enough to achieve what I want, only I don't know
how to do it. Any suggestion is appreciated.
Sebastiano
