Hi
In Camel 1.x its safer to *not* use the nested routes in splitter,
aggregator etc.
See: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/CAMEL-1697
What is the best option is to use separate route for the split, and
then link to this route using the direct endpoint
from(x).to("direct:split").to(result)
from("direct:split")
.splitter(....
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 9:28 AM, Claus Ibsen<claus.ib...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi
>
> Me again with a thought.
>
> I would like to look into supporting using a plain POJO for
> aggregation strategy to avoid being coupled to any Camel interfaces.
> This would also make it easier to work wit to avoid IN or OUT and whatnot.
>
> But the limitations would be that it works with bodies only. Well just
> wanna raise a flag for ideas.
> We could add annotations to help bind parameters.
>
> Or make some convention. For instance a plain method like this with 2
> parameters, and 1 return type.
> public String aggregateMe(String body, String newBody)
>
> Anyway just a thought.
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 9:25 AM, Claus Ibsen<claus.ib...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 10:59 PM, rogster<eric.d.eb...@lmco.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Does the example, Split aggregate request/reply sample, at
>>> http://camel.apache.org/splitter.html only work for Camel 2.0? I'm using
>>> camel 1.5.2 and I simply get the last split message returned to the caller,
>>> rather than the output from my custom aggregator. Looks like this was a
>>> defect in 1.5.0: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/CAMEL-1041.
>>> Should it be fixed in 1.5.2?
>>>
>> Yes it works in Camel 1.6.1.
>> I just ported the unit test from trunk to 1.x
>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=783655
>>
>> We have not released any 1.5.2 release. In fact neither a 1.5.1 release.
>> The latest is 1.6.1. Is it that release you are using?
>>
>> Anyway it should work on 1.6.1.
>>
>> Mind that you have to take care in your custom aggregator whether you
>> store the aggregated response
>> in either IN or OUT. It is in fact safest to store it in OUT.
>>
>>
>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Chris
>>> --
>>> View this message in context:
>>> http://www.nabble.com/Custome-aggregator-for-splitter-in-camel-1.5.2-tp23970911p23970911.html
>>> Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Claus Ibsen
>> Apache Camel Committer
>>
>> Open Source Integration: http://fusesource.com
>> Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/
>> Twitter: http://twitter.com/davsclaus
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Claus Ibsen
> Apache Camel Committer
>
> Open Source Integration: http://fusesource.com
> Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/
> Twitter: http://twitter.com/davsclaus
>
--
Claus Ibsen
Apache Camel Committer
Open Source Integration: http://fusesource.com
Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/
Twitter: http://twitter.com/davsclaus
