What do you mean by 1 = OUT, 2+ = IN ?
Charles Moulliard Senior Enterprise Architect Apache Camel Committer ***************************** blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 4:03 PM, Claus Ibsen <claus.ib...@gmail.com> wrote: > [15:59] <cibsen> chm007 its because of using AggregatorStrategy is > very low level > [15:59] <cibsen> you work on Exchange directly > [15:59] <cibsen> and it depends on how many processing steps you have > in the split sub route > [15:59] <cibsen> 1 = OUT > [15:59] <cibsen> 2+ = IN as Camel will use a Pipeline under the converers > [15:59] <cibsen> so Camel will do a OUT -> IN in the next processor > [15:59] <cibsen> so OUT -> IN to the AggregatorStrategy also > [15:59] <cibsen> its a bit confusing > [16:00] <cibsen> will be better when you can use a POJO for aggregation > > On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 2:11 PM, Charles Moulliard<cmoulli...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'm a little confused about the split EIP pattern combined with > aggregation > > strategy. In the example (see http://camel.apache.org/splitter.html - > Split > > aggregate request/reply sample), the out exchange is used to retrieved > the > > body content and also to set it because the pattern is of type InOut. > > > > I have created an aggregator but in my case, I must use the content of > the > > In to retrieve my body > > > > List requestMessages = new ArrayList(); > > > > if (oldExchange == null) { > > > > requestMessages.add(newExchange.getIn().getBody(RequestMessage.class)); > > newExchange.getOut().setBody(requestMessages); > > return newExchange; > > } else { > > // Get old messages > > requestMessages = oldExchange.getIn().getBody(List.class); > > > > // Get new and add it to the list > > > > requestMessages.add(newExchange.getOut().getBody(RequestMessage.class)); > > > > // Add to the exchange > > oldExchange.getOut().setBody(requestMessages); > > return oldExchange; > > > > } > > > > > > Questions : > > - Is the split EIP an InOut pattern ? > > - When I develop the aggregator like this, the headers of my messages > have > > disappeared when the endpoint called after the end of the split receives > the > > List of Objects. How can I avoid this ? > > > > Regards, > > > > Charles Moulliard > > Senior Enterprise Architect > > Apache Camel Committer > > > > ***************************** > > blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com > > > > > > -- > Claus Ibsen > Apache Camel Committer > > Open Source Integration: http://fusesource.com > Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/ > Twitter: http://twitter.com/davsclaus >
