On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 12:03 PM, huntc<hu...@mac.com> wrote: > > Hi there, > > I just used the concurrentConsumers parameter of the seda component and fell > into the trap of not including parameters in the producer URI. Having to > have the producer and consumer specify the same parameters seems troublesome > and non-intuitive. Additionally the producer URI shouldn't have to concern > itself with how the exchange will be consumed and doesn't elsewhere in > Camel. > > Do you think that this should be recognised as an issue to be fixed?
Already fixed in 2.0m3. I cant remember if we back-ported it to 1.x. There is a JIRA ticket about it. > > Kind regards, > Christopher > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/seda-uris-for-producers-and-consumers-tp24735545p24735545.html > Sent from the Camel - Users (activemq) mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > -- Claus Ibsen Apache Camel Committer Open Source Integration: http://fusesource.com Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/ Twitter: http://twitter.com/davsclaus
