On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 2:30 PM, Jörn Kottmann <[email protected]> wrote: > Claus Ibsen wrote: >> >> On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 5:10 PM, Jörn Kottmann <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> >>> Claus Ibsen wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> Hi >>>> >>>> You only have 1 consumer listening on the JMS topic >>>> <property name="concurrentConsumers" value="1" /> >>>> >>>> Try increasing this number. >>>> >>>> >>> >>> JMS Topics can only have one concurrent consumer, >>> so I guess I have to switch to a Queue, would it then >>> run 100 threads for concurrentConsumers=100 ? >>> >>> >> >> Yeah then you got 100 threads concurrently. >> Remember more is not always better. >> > > Sure, so if i disable transactions could it then > processes more messages parallel than > the number of concurrent consumers ? >
Not really as you got 100 concurrent consumers, with or without transactions. Why dont you try it out and do some benchmark and see how it goes. Do you actually have any SLA requirements you can use to hold up against? > Jörn > > -- Claus Ibsen Apache Camel Committer Open Source Integration: http://fusesource.com Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/ Twitter: http://twitter.com/davsclaus
