Claus Ibsen-2 wrote:
>
>
> Yeah stop() is the right way to do so. Its also easy to understand
> what it does :)
>
> The message filter is another way (a more classic EIP solution)
> http://camel.apache.org/message-filter.html
>
>
I had wondered about the filter - but I didn't know what happened to
exchanges that failed the filter. The incoming endpoint will be a JMS
messaging queue - so I didn't want to take a chance that a message failing
the filter would go back on the queue, or get sent to any deadletter queues.
But if an exchanging failing a filter is simply thrown away just like a
.stop() - then it would also work. Just depends on what feels more natural
in our route.
Thanks for the help!
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Best-way-to-throw-away-an-exchange-in-a-route-in-an-otherwise%28%29-case-tp25933807p25960512.html
Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
