Sounds interesting. I'll have a look at this. Thanks, Sébastien.
Claus Ibsen-2 wrote: > > On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 6:53 PM, Seb- <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> Let's say I have 3 components, Component1 is a RecipientList sending the >> message to both Component2 and Component3. >> Is there an easy configuration way for Camel to do a synchronization on >> outputs (o2 & o3) of Component2 & Component3 with the original message >> coming from Component1. >> >> /----[]----- o2 >> i1 --[]--/ >> \ >> \-----[]---- o3 >> > > Yes its possible unfortunately we didnt make that possible easily out > of the box until Camel 2.2. You may say that slipped our minds. > The recipient list in 2.2 supports AggregationStrategy so you can > combine the response from o2 and o3 as you like. > > Ticket about it > https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/CAMEL-2223 > > > See more at, section Using custom AggregationStrategy > http://camel.apache.org/recipient-list.html > > See this thread for how you may work around and with some custom > coding do that in 2.1 or older > http://old.nabble.com/recipientList-multithreading-td26635868.html > > > > > >> Thanks, >> Regards, >> Sébastien. >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://old.nabble.com/Group-of-routes-and-Synchronization-on-outputs-of-the-group-after-a-split-tp26667241p26667241.html >> Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> > > > > -- > Claus Ibsen > Apache Camel Committer > > Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen/ > Open Source Integration: http://fusesource.com > Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/ > Twitter: http://twitter.com/davsclaus > > -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Group-of-routes-and-Synchronization-on-outputs-of-the-group-after-a-split-tp26667241p26668227.html Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
