Hi Claus, I'm happy to create a ticket of course, however I'm not clear on what the resolution is. I am not sure that implementing a "disconnect" URI option is the way to go though as per FTP. My use case is that I want to establish a connection, send multiple messages within a loop through that *same* connection and then close the connection.
I do not think that I want to change my URI for just the last message sent... that sounds a little messy. I suppose a header value would get over this as per consuming messages from MINA and would be nicer programatically. However and most importantly, if I use a template then I do not think there's a guarantee that I'm going to send through the same connection each time I send a message in my loop i.e. if another thread decides also to send messages through the same URI then could it: (i) hijack the same connection; and (ii) potentially cause my subsequent messages to go over another connection? Neither of these two scenarios would be good. While we're figuring this out, is my usage of a Producer directly valid as a work-around? Kind regards, Christopher -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/requestBodyAndHeader-and-HEADER_CLOSE_SESSION_WHEN_COMPLETE-tp27175565p27289240.html Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
