I don't think it has to do with the browser.  I'm using javascript to send
and receive the message.  It's a client test file I took from a servicemix
sample:

http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/servicemix/smx3/trunk/samples/bridge-camel/client.html

And besides, the 500 error is returned when I have 'handled(false)' in the
route.  So, it is clear that a 500 error isn't being hidden by any external
forces.


Claus Ibsen-2 wrote:
> 
> On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 6:31 PM, jfaath <jfa...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> By consulting the documentation, I came up with this code to handle an
>> error
>> for messages sent to a jetty http endpoint:
>>
>> onException(SchemaValidationException.class)
>> .handled(true)
>> .transform()
>> .simple("The format of the incoming message does not conform to the
>> specification.");
>>
>> Everything works fine, except using "handled(true)" causes a 200 OK
>> response
>> to be sent back to the client.  When I use "handled(false)" a 500
>> response
>> is returned, but I lose my custom error message.
>>
>> Is there any way to return a 500 error but keep the nice error message?
>>
> 
> I am sure it returns your nice message with HTTP error code 500.
> 
> I wonder if you webbrowser or what you use to view the result may
> suppress the nice message and display its own message.
> The browser may have an setting to disable this.
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> -JF
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://old.nabble.com/Default-error-handler%2C-changing-HTTP-response-code-tp27721146p27721146.html
>> Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>>
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Claus Ibsen
> Apache Camel Committer
> 
> Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen/
> Open Source Integration: http://fusesource.com
> Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/
> Twitter: http://twitter.com/davsclaus
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://old.nabble.com/Default-error-handler%2C-changing-HTTP-response-code-tp27721146p27759591.html
Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Reply via email to