Could those be parameters on the camel context ?

On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 13:30, Willem Jiang <willem.ji...@gmail.com> wrote:

> +1 for #[], or #p{}.
> The other options still make the Spring EL confused.
>
> Willem
>
>
> Claus Ibsen wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> See ticket
>> https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/CAMEL-2599
>>
>> The problem is that Spring 3.0 includes a EL by default which is
>> automatic in use in the Spring XML files.
>> It uses the same tokens as we do with Camel Properties component and
>> therefore Spring EL fails with an exception.
>>
>> The easiest and also least problematic resolution is to use a
>> different tokens in Camel to avoid the clash.
>> It will also be least surprise by Camel end users if they mix and
>> match between Spring EL and Camel Properties.
>>
>> So what tokens do you want to use? Currently we did use
>> - prefix = #{
>> - suffix = }
>>
>> For example:
>>                from("#{cool.start}")
>>
>> .to("log:#{cool.start}?showBodyType=false&showExchangeId=#{cool.showid}")
>>                    .to("mock:#{cool.result}");
>>
>>
>> A)
>> ===
>> I am thinking of changing to:
>> - prefix = #[
>> - suffix = ]
>>
>> For example:
>>                from("#[cool.start]")
>>
>> .to("log:#[cool.start]?showBodyType=false&showExchangeId=#[cool.showid]")
>>                    .to("mock:#[cool.result]");
>>
>> B)
>> ===
>> Or maybe?
>> - prefix = #p{
>> - suffix = }
>>
>> For example:
>>                from("#p{cool.start}")
>>
>>
>> .to("log:#p{cool.start}?showBodyType=false&showExchangeId=#p{cool.showid}")
>>                    .to("mock:#p{cool.result}");
>>
>>
>> C)
>> ====
>> We cannot do this one
>> - prefix = ${
>> - suffix = }
>>
>> As it will clash with Camel Simple language (would take more work to
>> let them co-exist in peace :)
>> However we could most likely use a longer preifx such as
>>
>> - prefix = ${p:
>> - suffix = }
>>
>> For example:
>>                from("${p:cool.start}")
>>
>>
>> .to("log:${p:cool.start}?showBodyType=false&showExchangeId=$p{p:cool.showid}")
>>                    .to("mock:${p:cool.result}");
>>
>>
>> Do you have any thoughts and preference what tokens to use?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>


-- 
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
------------------------
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
------------------------
Open Source SOA
http://fusesource.com

Reply via email to