Thanks Claus,
I just created a minor bug-report
(https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/CAMEL-2678). 
I'll have a look on extending the FileIdempotentRepository and make a
"flush" on remove.

Bests,
Farhad S.


Claus Ibsen-2 wrote:
> 
> On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 10:29 AM, shirazi <m...@farhad.eu> wrote:
>>
>> Thanks Claus,
>> Acutally there are some scenarios in which one may need to rerun a file
>> through a workflow and it makes neccessary to remove the file from the
>> idempotent repository. My specific problem is that upon a server restart,
>> the file is not picked up by the workflow because my remove was not
>> persisted.
>> I'm not sure if I can remove the entry from the repository-file before
>> the
>> camel context loads it, or preferably just after removing it from the
>> cache.
>>
> 
> You can implement your own repository.
> And/or extend the code from Camel to force a flush on remove.
> Or submit a patch to camel-core to have it flush on remove, which
> makes to do as a remove is not being executed that many times compared
> to add.
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> Bests,
>> -Farhad S.
>>
>>
>>
>> Claus Ibsen-2 wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 9:39 AM, shirazi <m...@farhad.eu> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>> It seems that removing an entry (file name) programatically from a file
>>>> idempotent repository has only effect on the cache and does not get
>>>> persisted on the file repository.
>>>> Do I need to do more beside calling "remove" on the repository object
>>>> to
>>>> get
>>>> it persisted? Or is this a bug?
>>>>
>>>
>>> The file based store is just a dump of the LRUCache, which means that
>>> in essence removing is not spooled to disk, only adds.
>>> This is much easier as add is just appending to an existing file.
>>>
>>> The only situation I can see is that a file should be removed due it
>>> could not be successfully processed, and hence it ought to be retried
>>> again.
>>> And that your server crashes before it re processes the file. Then the
>>> file based repo will contain that file name. You can easily fix this
>>> manually by removing
>>> the entry from the file before starting the server.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> Bests,
>>>> -Farhad S.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> View this message in context:
>>>> http://old.nabble.com/Removing-entries-from-FileIdempotentRepository-don%27t-get-persisted-tp28373878p28373878.html
>>>> Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Claus Ibsen
>>> Apache Camel Committer
>>>
>>> Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen/
>>> Open Source Integration: http://fusesource.com
>>> Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/
>>> Twitter: http://twitter.com/davsclaus
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://old.nabble.com/Removing-entries-from-FileIdempotentRepository-don%27t-get-persisted-tp28373878p28374328.html
>> Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>>
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Claus Ibsen
> Apache Camel Committer
> 
> Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen/
> Open Source Integration: http://fusesource.com
> Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/
> Twitter: http://twitter.com/davsclaus
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://old.nabble.com/Removing-entries-from-FileIdempotentRepository-don%27t-get-persisted-tp28373878p28374937.html
Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Reply via email to