Hello Willem,
thanks for the reply. I'm fine with this. I will not enhance this component,
unless somebody smarter than me propose otherwise... :-)

Christian

On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 6:46 AM, Willem Jiang <willem.ji...@gmail.com>wrote:

> Hi Christian,
>
> It should be easy to add the configure feature into CsvDataFromat.
> But after checking out the web site of the commons csv, it looks like the
> commons csv 1.0 is never released since 2008.
>
> Maybe we should consider to retire camel-csv and I don't think we need to
> enhance it as there are some alternatives solution in camel already.
>
> Willem
> Christian Müller wrote:
>
>> Hello Claus,
>>
>> today I realized, that the org.apache.camel.model.dataformat.CsvDataFormat
>> doesn't support any attributes or nested elements in the XML DSL. So,
>> currently the last unit test I provided for camel-csv, is not possible for
>> the XML DSL. Should we improve camel-csv for this? I'm not sure, because
>> with camel-bindy and soon also with camel-smooks (I waiting for Tom
>> Fennellys feedback) we offer two alternatives...
>>
>> Regards,
>> Christian
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 10:48 PM, Christian Müller <
>> christian.muel...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>  Hello Andy!
>>>
>>> I added a unit test for camel-csv which uses a pipe by marshaling the
>>> object. You will find the test [here|
>>>
>>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/camel/trunk/components/camel-csv/src/test/java/org/apache/camel/dataformat]./csv/CsvMarshalPipeDelimiterTest.java?view=markup<http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/camel/trunk/components/camel-csv/src/test/java/org/apache/camel/dataformat%5D./csv/CsvMarshalPipeDelimiterTest.java?view=markup>
>>> <
>>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/camel/trunk/components/camel-csv/src/test/java/org/apache/camel/dataformat%5D./csv/CsvMarshalPipeDelimiterTest.java?view=markup
>>> >
>>>
>>> I will also add an unit test for the XML DSL, but currently I have some
>>> problems with it. After that, I will review the wiki and may be I will
>>> update it.
>>>
>>> Hope this helps,
>>> Christian
>>>
>>>
>>
>

Reply via email to