Fine, I currently work on the 2.3.0 version of /tags. Because I have
some trouble to build the trunk.

Ingo
> On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 4:13 PM, Ingo Düppe <mailing-li...@dueppe.com> wrote:
>   
>> Hi,
>>
>> does any reason exists for not upgrading camel-quartz to use the current
>> quartz version 1.8.1?
>>
>>     
> Its been upgraded to 1.8.2 on trunk.
>
>
>   
>> Regrads
>>
>> Ingo
>>
>> Am 04.06.10 14:36, schrieb Ingo Düppe:
>>     
>>> Hi Claus,
>>>
>>> fine, I might possibly have some time on next monday to create a patch
>>> for it.
>>> If not then in two weeks after my vacation I will create a patch for it.
>>>
>>> Regards
>>>
>>> Ingo
>>>
>>> Am 04.06.10 06:55, schrieb Claus Ibsen:
>>>
>>>       
>>>> Hi Ingo
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 10:30 PM, Ingo Düppe <mailing-li...@dueppe.com> 
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>         
>>>>> Hi Claus,
>>>>>
>>>>> well I'm not sure if it is right. But I guess if the trigger is marked
>>>>> as volatile it will be automatically removed within in the database.
>>>>> Normally volatile jobs won't be stored in a db but in a cluster
>>>>> environment they will be.
>>>>>
>>>>> The problem with camel is, that I cannot define an volatile trigger like
>>>>> "quartz://trigger?job.volatility=true&cron..." and also define a cluster
>>>>> environment within the quartz.properties. This is because CamelJob isn't
>>>>> serializable.
>>>>>
>>>>> As I mentioned I haven't dig into it very deep. I just wanted to be
>>>>> sure, that I didn't miss something obviously before I invest time into it.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>           
>>>> Ah thanks for point this out. I have created a ticket
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/CAMEL-2788
>>>>
>>>> To improve camel-quartz so you can set that volatile option and also
>>>> see what we can about the quartz.properties etc.
>>>> And to see how we can serialize CamelJob
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>         
>>>>> Regards
>>>>>
>>>>> Ingo
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Am 03.06.10 15:08, schrieb Claus Ibsen:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>           
>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If you have the app crash using kill -3 / -9 and then start it again
>>>>>> and expect quartz to recover and it does not.
>>>>>> Then I think you should ask at the Quartz user forum about this.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And maybe you can create a plain example with pure Quartz to not
>>>>>> pollute the example with Camel as the Quartz guys would just say its a
>>>>>> Camel problem.
>>>>>> Just as I say its most likely a Quartz problem :)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And if there is something that must be configured / tweaked in Quartz
>>>>>> to have this working then let us know. Maybe there is something we can
>>>>>> do easier in camel-quartz for that.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 12:08 PM, Ingo Düppe <mailing-li...@dueppe.com> 
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>             
>>>>>>> Am 01.06.10 08:37, schrieb Claus Ibsen:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>               
>>>>>>>> On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 6:48 PM, Ingo Düppe <mailing-li...@dueppe.com> 
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>                 
>>>>>>>>> I forgot to mention that I currently use version 2.2.0.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>                   
>>>>>>>> Can you create a small sample application that demonstrates this? Then
>>>>>>>> its much easier to look into it to see what / if we can do in Camel.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>                 
>>>>>>>>> - Ingo
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>                   
>>>>>>> Sure, i created a small example that you can find at
>>>>>>> http://dl.dropbox.com/u/4043036/quartz-cluster.tar.gz.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It contains just a small JUnit Test Case (see below). The test runs fine
>>>>>>> as long you execute the whole test. As I find out yesterday, quartz
>>>>>>> deletes some information within the database on a clean shutdown.
>>>>>>> So the next test run will also run fine.
>>>>>>> But if you kill the running test - to simulate a server crash - the next
>>>>>>> test run will end up with an exception.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So how do I handle such inconsist data on startup of camel?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>  Ingo
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> @RunWith(SpringJUnit4ClassRunner.class)
>>>>>>> @ContextConfiguration(
>>>>>>>        locations = {
>>>>>>>            "classpath*:context-test.xml"
>>>>>>>        }
>>>>>>> )
>>>>>>> public class QuartzClusterTest extends TestCase {
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>    @Autowired
>>>>>>>    private CamelContext camelContext;
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>    @EndpointInject(uri = "mock:result")
>>>>>>>    protected MockEndpoint resultEndpoint;
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>    @Test
>>>>>>>    @DirtiesContext
>>>>>>>    @Repeat(value=2)
>>>>>>>    public void testTriggering() throws Exception {
>>>>>>>        camelContext.addRoutes(new QuartzRouteBuilder());
>>>>>>>        resultEndpoint.setMinimumExpectedMessageCount(5);
>>>>>>>        resultEndpoint.setResultWaitTime(5000L);
>>>>>>>        resultEndpoint.assertIsSatisfied();
>>>>>>>    }
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>    public static class QuartzRouteBuilder extends RouteBuilder {
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>        @Override
>>>>>>>        public void configure() throws Exception {
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> from("quartz://trigger?stateful=true&cron=0/1+*+*+*+*+?").to("mock:result");
>>>>>>>        }
>>>>>>>    }
>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>               
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>             
>>>>>
>>>>>           
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>         
>>>
>>>
>>>       
>>
>>     
>
>
>   

Reply via email to