The direct endpoint is synchronous, and its actually just like to glue
two endpoints together. It runs in the current thread. Its like a
procedure call.
It does NOT have any queues, so the Exchange is routed immediately and
as said uses the current thread.
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 5:20 PM, hiba <mohammad.h...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have an direct end point : say, direct:route1.
> I have a multi-threaded environment, and each thread puts some few tens of
> messages in this direct end point.
>
> I have three questions to ask :
>
> 1) Are the methods of beans which define my route work as though they are
> synchronized?(is doTranslation() synchronized?? by camel). Note : i didnot
> specifically synchronize doTranslation method.
> 2) Each message is processed one by one or camel does some multi-threading,
> so that messages are processed parallelly.
> 3) Does the sequencing of messages are kept as they were placed into this
> direct end point. Atleast the sequencing of messages sent by each thread
> should be maintained.
>
> The definition of my route is given below :
>
> from("direct:route1").bean(MyTranslator.class,
> "doTranslation").to("direct:route2");
>
>
>
> Can please someone throw some light on this
>
> Thanks in advance
> Hiba
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/how-camel-handles-multiple-message-producers-tp2265509p2265509.html
> Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
--
Claus Ibsen
Apache Camel Committer
Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen/
Open Source Integration: http://fusesource.com
Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/
Twitter: http://twitter.com/davsclaus
