So, considering this route:
from("file:/outbox").to("someRemoteServer").to("file:/home/inbox");
What do you consider to be a better design:
1- a) files from outbox goes to remoteServer-producer
b) remoteServer-producer sends file to remote connection
c) remoteServer-endpoint forward remote incomingFiles to this route
rather files from outbox
2- a) files from outbox goes to remoteServer-producer
b) remoteServer-producer sends file to remote connection
c) remoteServer-endpoint continue processing files from outbox to the
rest of this route
Bruno Borges
www.brunoborges.com.br
+55 21 76727099
"The glory of great men should always be
measured by the means they have used to
acquire it."
- Francois de La Rochefoucauld
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 2:57 PM, Claus Ibsen <claus.ib...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 7:17 PM, Bruno Borges <bruno.bor...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Is this statement correct?
> >
> > Are all endpoint's consumers only created when Endpoint is referenced by
> a
> > from() ?
> >
>
> consumers is created when they are needed. And from(xx) is created a
> consumer on endpoint xxx.
> Where as to(xxx) is created a producer on endpoint xxxx.
>
>
> > Cheers,
> > Bruno Borges
> > www.brunoborges.com.br
> > +55 21 76727099
> >
> > "The glory of great men should always be
> > measured by the means they have used to
> > acquire it."
> > - Francois de La Rochefoucauld
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Claus Ibsen
> Apache Camel Committer
>
> Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen/
> Open Source Integration: http://fusesource.com
> Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/
> Twitter: http://twitter.com/davsclaus
>
