Hi,
I saw your previous mail, and from what you are saying the result seems to be
incorrect.
We are now trying to get the 2.5.0 release out. Will take a look as soon as I
am done with the release.
Thanks for the patience and for using camel,
Hadrian
On Oct 25, 2010, at 6:45 AM, ext2 wrote:
> Hi:
>
> Here is a simple route, I think it's result should be 6, but the result is
> 2;
>
>
>
> from("direct:start2").multicast(new SumAggregateBean())
>
> .pipeline().transform(BeanLanguage.bean(IncreaseOne.class)).bean(new
> IncreaseTwo()).end()
>
> .pipeline().transform(BeanLanguage.bean(IncreaseOne.class)).bean(new
> IncreaseTwo()).end()
>
> .end()
>
> .to("mock:result2");
>
>
>
>
>
> In this route, IncreaseOne just add the input by one, IncreaseTwo: just add
> the input by two; The SumAggregateBean just add sum the input integer.
>
> If I send number 0 to the route, I think each pipe line 's result should be
> 0+1+2=3, and final result of route should be 3+3=6; but the result is 2;
>
>
>
> Why? Is it a bug?
>
>
>
> Following is the source code of IncreaseOne, IncreaseTwo, and
> SumAggregateBeans;
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> public static class IncreaseOne{
>
> public int increase(int v)
>
> {
>
> return v+1;
>
> }
>
> }
>
> public static class IncreaseTwo{
>
> public int increase(int v) {
>
> return v+2;
>
> }
>
> }
>
>
>
> public static class SumAggregateBean implements AggregationStrategy{
>
> public Exchange aggregate(Exchange oldExchange, Exchange newExchange) {
>
> if(oldExchange == null)
>
> return newExchange;
>
> int v = parseInt(newExchange.getIn().getBody()) +
>
> parseInt(oldExchange.getIn().getBody());
>
> newExchange.getIn().setBody(v);
>
> return newExchange;
>
> }
>
> }
>
