The NMR can pass in any kind of objects. Its the JBI which has to normalize to XML. (due the spec. says so)
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 9:21 AM, klausb <klaus.baumec...@hp.com> wrote: > > Hi Claus, > > I was explicitely heading to camel to avoid XMl marshaling for NMR. > I need pretty high performance to pass messages around. Therefore I want to > leave them in their native format (POJOs). That's where Camel comes along > very handy. > At the same time the VM endpoint promised the pub-sub feature which also > jumps into a requirement. > Do you have other alternative in mind than using VM for pub-sub with high > throughput? > > Btw. The non-OSGi test to verify my assumption on multipleConsumers with VM > failed. I created three camel contexts (one sender, two receivers). > > klaus. > -- > View this message in context: > http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Question-on-VM-Endpoint-multipleConsumers-and-OSGi-tp3284450p3285739.html > Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > -- Claus Ibsen ----------------- FuseSource Email: cib...@fusesource.com Web: http://fusesource.com Twitter: davsclaus Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/ Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen/
