Hi William, I want to use this CXF endpoint just as a normal typed CXF endpoint and I expect to have arbitrary generic CXF interceptors to be placed just as for the normal case. So, I don't think Camel DSL or processor can fit into this picture.
Regards, aki On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 7:56 PM, William Tam <email.w...@gmail.com> wrote: > What does your CXF interceptor do? You know you have Camel DSL or > processor in your arsenal. > > On 02/15/2011 01:02 PM, Aki Yoshida wrote: >> >> Hi William, >> >> I can't use camel-http because I would like to call some CXF interceptors. >> >> I am wondering if we can modify CxfProducer and CxfEndpoint to support >> the dispatch mode. >> CXF's DispatchImpl does a few things to set up the dispatch mode >> (i.e., setting the dummy service class, adding the dispatch binding >> operations, etc) and it eventually calls the same ClientImpl's invoke >> method at the end. So, it seems possible to have this feature >> integrated in CxfProducer/CxfEndpoint. >> >> I would like to experiment with this idea. If you have some suggestion >> that would be appreciated. >> Thanks. >> >> Regards, Aki >> >> >> On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 5:19 PM, William Tam<email.w...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Aki, >>> >>> If you need to send arbitrary payload to some target servcie, you may >>> consider using Camel HTTP component. Camel CXF component uses >>> ClientFactoryBean APIs (including message mode) which is subject to the >>> limitation you observed. >>> >>> Regards, >>> William >>> >>> On 02/15/2011 07:49 AM, Aki Yoshida wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> If you are writing a CXF client, you can write a client using the >>>> CXF's dispatch API to send an arbitrary payload to some target >>>> service. >>>> I would like to configure a camel cxf endpoint that does the same >>>> thing. However, the code seems to require either the WSDL or the >>>> service class. >>>> When I do not set both the wsdlURL and serviceClass parameters, it >>>> still assumes the service class is set and starts initializing the >>>> service class, leading to an NPE. >>>> >>>> Am I missing something here or is this a known limitaiton? >>>> >>>> Thanks for your help. >>>> >>>> Regards, Aki >>>> >
