On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 4:34 PM, Claus Ibsen <[email protected]> wrote:
> Just use a direct endpoint in the DLC.
>
> Then you can use a camel route where you can grab the caused exception
> message and do whatever you want with it.
>

You can also just use a bean endpoint in the DLC.

And then in the bean (pojo) have a single method where you do with the
message what you want to do

public void logFailedMessage(Exchange exchange, Exception cause) {
   ..
}


>
> On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 2:58 PM, John McDonald <[email protected]> wrote:
>> I feel this is an embarrassingly simple question - but I've read around and 
>> cant get things to happen the way I want.
>>
>> I am using the following dead-letter channel as a strategy for handling 
>> errors
>>
>>        errorHandler(deadLetterChannel("log:RoutingError?level=ERROR"));
>>
>> but my problem is that I am unable to control the log content.  What I would 
>> like is to be able to emit the class of exception and the exception message 
>> - but this idiom simply applies a toString() like formatting of the exchange 
>> with no indication as to what the failing content is.  I have tried adding a 
>> beanRef at the end so I can get at the good bits but it appears completely 
>> ignored
>>
>> What I really want is something that stops the route treatment (not 
>> attempting to roll it back) so that I can perform my own processing 
>> including logging
>
>
>
> --
> Claus Ibsen
> -----------------
> FuseSource
> Email: [email protected]
> Web: http://fusesource.com
> CamelOne 2011: http://fusesource.com/camelone2011/
> Twitter: davsclaus
> Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/
> Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen/
>



-- 
Claus Ibsen
-----------------
FuseSource
Email: [email protected]
Web: http://fusesource.com
CamelOne 2011: http://fusesource.com/camelone2011/
Twitter: davsclaus
Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/
Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen/

Reply via email to