I can't see the code. Perhaps this is the mailinglist issue Claus posted
some days ago. But anyway - on one side it is a discussion about coding
style. I think it's cleaner / easier to read to have two three line
routes where each of the route has its own and clear task to do, than a
all in one solution with a if clause in the end. But as I said this is a
question of taste. On the other side I don't have a quick tip for a all
in one solution...
On 06.04.2011 19:29, jpalmer1026 wrote:
Nothing is wrong with the proposed solution per se. It would just be cleaner
if at the end of the route I could just put some sort of otherwise clause
since I know at this point that the file isn't one contained in the list
that is getting passed in. Note sure why you couldn't read my snippet (I
didn't see any tags to surround it with) but here it is again:
--
View this message in context:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Route-Question-tp4281861p4286838.html
Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
