Yes, there is a subtle difference: 1. http://activemq.apache.org/how-should-i-package-applications-using-camel-and-activemq.html "[...] you may wish to use Camel's Enterprise Integration Patterns *inside* the ActiveMQ Broker [...]"
2. http://camel.apache.org/activemq.html http://camel.apache.org/jms.html "The [Camel] ActiveMQ component allows messages to be sent to a JMS Queue or Topic or messages to be consumed from a JMS Queue or Topic using Apache ActiveMQ" - i.e. outside the broker. I hope that helps, Hadrian On Apr 7, 2011, at 2:09 PM, Gert Villemos wrote: > What is the difference between the > > * Camel-Activemq (1.1.0) > * Activemq-Camel (5.2.0) > > Libraries? > > Is the 'Camel-Activemq' library simply an old deprecated version no longer > used? And should I always use 'Activemq-Camel'? Or is there a subtle > difference? > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Difference-between-camel-activemq-1-1-0-and-activemq-camel-5-2-0-libraries-tp4289122p4289122.html > Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
