Yeah thats one way of seeing the world.
There is a FAQ http://camel.apache.org/how-does-camel-compare-to-servicemix.html http://camel.apache.org/how-does-camel-compare-to-servicemix-eip.html Also stackoverflow have some QA about Camel and SMX. For example: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2705043/java-messaging-difference-between-activemq-mule-servicemix-and-camel 2011/6/5 ltomuno <ltom...@163.com>: > camel is a component, servicemix is a container > from function > > servlet container(e.g. tomcat) < application container(e.g. jboss) < esb > container(e.g. servicemix) > in one sense, esb is a more powerful container than application container, > contains the EIP functions, and can provide outside services alone, but > camel can't, it just a classic component > Do I thinking correct? > thanks -- Claus Ibsen ----------------- FuseSource Email: cib...@fusesource.com Web: http://fusesource.com Twitter: davsclaus, fusenews Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/ Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen/
