You have to set the brokerURL on the PooledConnectionFactory.

On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 7:10 AM, Jason Whaley <jasonwha...@gmail.com> wrote:
> It's quite possible I'm being dense here, but when I am setting up a 
> PooledConnectionFactory in java code for the camel ActiveMQ component, the 
> component is instead creating connections for a broker at 
> "tcp://localhost:61616" irrespective of what I have passed in to 
> setBrokerURL.  For instance, the following code
>
>        PooledConnectionFactory pooledConnectionFactory = new 
> PooledConnectionFactory();
>        pooledConnectionFactory.setMaxConnections(8);
>        pooledConnectionFactory.setMaximumActive(500);
>
>        ActiveMQComponent activeMQComponent = 
> ActiveMQComponent.activeMQComponent("tcp://localhost:61618");
>        activeMQComponent.setUsePooledConnection(true);
>        activeMQComponent.setConnectionFactory(pooledConnectionFactory);
>        camelContext.addComponent("amq", activeMQComponent);
>
> results in this output in the logs:
>
>        1916 [ActiveMQ Task-1] INFO 
> org.apache.activemq.transport.failover.FailoverTransport - Successfully 
> connected to tcp://localhost:61616
>
> Note the port mismatch.  I confirmed it is indeed working with a broker on 
> localhost at port 61616 whenever  I setup a route that includes a 
> to("amq:queue:SomeQueue").  The same behavior occurs when I change the 
> hostname/ip as well - it still connects to localhost:61616.
>
> Then once I comment out related to using pooling and keep only the following 
> two lines:
>
>        ActiveMQComponent activeMQComponent = 
> ActiveMQComponent.activeMQComponent("tcp://localhost:61618");
>        camelContext.addComponent("amq", activeMQComponent);
>
> Then this works as expected and the camel routes are working against  the 
> broker I have listening on port 61618.
>
> Am I missing something obvious with using PooledConnectionFactory, is this is 
> a PEBCAK, or is there really something wrong with setting up pooled 
> connections in the activemq component this way?
>
>
>

Reply via email to