There are some faq entries[1][2][3] about the comparison of Mule,
ServiceMix and Camel which you may take a look.
[1]http://camel.apache.org/how-does-camel-compare-to-mule.html
[2]http://camel.apache.org/how-does-camel-compare-to-servicemix.html
[3]http://camel.apache.org/how-does-camel-compare-to-servicemix-eip.html
On 8/28/11 10:13 PM, Vitaliy Semochkin wrote:
Hello,
i'm new to Camel and at the moment choosing between Mule, Apache
ServiceMix or Apache Camel for solving following task:
A flow starts when web service is called , N recipients ( a folder
with files, web service, jms queue) receive the message
Monitoring (at least logging) is needed.
Multiple similar flows can exists.
In case a recipient is offline the flow should wait till it gets
online or report failure if TTL is exceeded.
Online redeployment is needed. During redeployment of a flow the
flows that are running are not stopped. (optional)
Would be grateful if people with experience will give a hits if Camel
suits for such tasks and how would it be better to implement it, or
maybe Mule or ServiceMix suits for it better?
Thanks in advance,
Vitaly
--
Willem
----------------------------------
FuseSource
Web: http://www.fusesource.com
Blog: http://willemjiang.blogspot.com (English)
http://jnn.javaeye.com (Chinese)
Twitter: willemjiang
Weibo: willemjiang
