I now have a dead letter channel which is empty after losing 9 out of 10 
messages. I also added a logging handler which logged nothing. Verified the 
messages arrived at the broker, then they just vanished.

Alistair

-- 
mov eax,1
mov ebx,0
int 80h




On 28 Sep 2011, at 11:42, Alistair Young wrote:

> just noticed this:
> 
> Default Error Handler:
> "whenever an Exchange could not be processed the error is propagated back to 
> the client"
> 
> the client sends to topic://A and camel routes to topic://B. If the routing 
> fails will the Default Error Handler tell the client, even though the client 
> doesn't know about topic://B ?
> 
> the client does not receive any errors for the disappearing messages.
> 
> Alistair
> 
> -- 
> mov eax,1
> mov ebx,0
> int 80h
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On 28 Sep 2011, at 11:21, Mick Knutson wrote:
> 
>> Do you have a deadLetterChannel setup in case of message exceptions?
>> 
>> ---
>> Thank You…
>> 
>> Mick Knutson, President
>> 
>> BASE Logic, Inc.
>> Enterprise Architecture, Design, Mentoring & Agile Consulting
>> p. (855) BASE-LOGIC: (227-3564-42)
>> p. (478) BASE-LOGIC (227-3564-42)
>> f. (855) BASE-LOGIC: (227-3564-42)
>> 
>> Website: http://www.baselogic.com
>> Blog: http://www.baselogic.com/blog/
>> Linked IN: http://linkedin.com/in/mickknutson
>> Twitter: http://twitter.com/mickknutson
>> ---
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 6:16 AM, Alistair Young 
>> <alistair.yo...@uhi.ac.uk>wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi there,
>>> 
>>> is there anything that would cause camel to ignore messages in a route? I'm
>>> getting persistent messages simply disappearing from a transacted route.
>>> I've verified the messages arrive at the activemq broker (tcpdump) and also
>>> that on one occasion, 5 out of 6 of the messages just disappeared. They
>>> didn't make it into the route as the processor didn't see them and the
>>> consumer never saw them either. They just vanished. Restarting the broker
>>> seems to ease the situation until the next disappearing messages and it gets
>>> worse and worse.
>>> 
>>> thanks,
>>> 
>>> Alistair
>>> 
>>> --
>>> mov eax,1
>>> mov ebx,0
>>> int 80h
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
> 

Reply via email to