On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 8:31 PM, diwakar <diwakar.j...@nsn.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks for the reply. With async and defaultThreadPoolProfile, is > Camel support for parallel processing as good as Servicemix 3.x. Are there > any known limitations in Camel over JBI(Servicemix3.x). Is there any good > reason to use Servicemix JBI instead of Camel. > Please let me know your comment. >
No JBI is dying/dead. http://gnodet.blogspot.com/2010/12/thoughts-about-servicemix.html For new projects you should consider *not* to use JBI, unless you are already use JBI a lot, and are happy with it as is. We recommend to use Camel as replacement for JBI in SMX. > With Best Regards, > Diwakar > > -- > View this message in context: > http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Thread-pool-for-components-in-Camel-tp4722190p4858019.html > Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > -- Claus Ibsen ----------------- FuseSource Email: cib...@fusesource.com Web: http://fusesource.com Twitter: davsclaus, fusenews Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/ Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen/
