my take is that unless you explicitly need any Servicemix features, then just use Karaf because its lighter weight, etc...
diwakar wrote: > > Hi, > > Thanks for the replies. > > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6930236/apache-karaf-vs-servicemix has > >> the two primary reason for using ServiceMix is if you want 1) > an ESB, 2) NMR (a feature that allows you to community between bundles AND > instances of Karaf) > AFAIK Camel does not use servicemix NMR and Camel itself is like > an ESB. > It is still not clear how hosting Camel in Servicemix 4.x is > better than Karaf. > > With Best Regards, > Diwakar > ----- Ben O'Day IT Consultant -http://consulting-notes.com -- View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Karaf-vs-Servicemix-4-x-tp4954984p4956433.html Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
