On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 9:22 PM, bbuzzard <billy.buzz...@bnsflogistics.com> wrote: > I just got back to this project and I tried the readLockCheckInterval and it > works fine. I am curious about if I need the "delay" parameter if I'm using > the "readLockCheckInterval". I was using a "delay=15000, > readLockCheckInterval=30000 and readLockTimeout=60000". I thought this > would check the route every 15 seconds for a file and if a file was found it > would start the readLockCheckInterval and if nothing changed at the end of > that interval of 30 seconds then the file would be processed. But now I > questioning whether I need "delay" at all. Is there any > advantage/disadvantage to using the "delay" parameter with the > "readLockCheckInterval" parameter? >
The delay is the period you wait between polling the FTP server. So if you do not use a delay option, then Camel will check the FTP server very frequently. > -- > View this message in context: > http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/How-do-I-avoid-consuming-zero-byte-files-from-a-remote-FTP-server-tp4896550p4995599.html > Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > -- Claus Ibsen ----------------- FuseSource Email: cib...@fusesource.com Web: http://fusesource.com Twitter: davsclaus, fusenews Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/ Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen/
