On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 9:41 AM, bvahdat <babak.vah...@swissonline.ch> wrote: > Good morning Claus, > > If you would go through all of my posts in this thread and read them > carefully you will realize that my concern was *not* the failed unit test at > all but the *behaviour* of the file consumer. Nevertheless if you still want > it to be in that way I would be more than happy to do that, should I? >
Yes posting in a new thread to avoid discussing 2+ things in the same thread, is good practice. Also a new thread with a better matching title, would attract other Camel end users to read and participate. They would normally not care about a failed unit test, and thus skip reading the mails. > Babak > > -- > View this message in context: > http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Riding-on-org-apache-camel-language-TokenPairPredicateTest-tp5041981p5054859.html > Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Claus Ibsen ----------------- FuseSource Email: cib...@fusesource.com Web: http://fusesource.com Twitter: davsclaus, fusenews Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/ Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen/
