Hi

The behaviour you're observing has nothing to do with Camel itself but the
underlying JMS-Provider [1] which has many configuration options like for
the Dispatching-Policy as well.

Most probably if you would switch to another Provider (like IBM WebSphere
MQ) you would observe another behaviour for which you would then consolidate
it's own documentation.

I hope by now it's already clear to you why message 3, 6 and 9 are delayed
until message 0 has completed processing as having 3 concurrent consumer
that's what Round-Rubin is expected to be :-)

[1] http://activemq.apache.org/dispatch-policies.html

Babak

--
View this message in context: 
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/jms-concurrentConsumers-is-not-competing-consumers-tp5455658p5485752.html
Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Reply via email to