RubyTuesdayDONO wrote > > Mario, > > if you know in advance which beans will be consuming from the endpoint, > you > could define them statically using Multicast, without the dynamism of > Recipient-List. >
Thank you for your suggestions but the new requirements from my customer implies a dynamic recipient list. Anyway I will look if I can go back to a static list. -- View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/RecipientList-without-aggregation-tp5601505p5608600.html Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
