Could you set multipl eConsumers=true also on the producer (to("vm:..."))
side.Best, Christian Sent from a mobile device Am 16.05.2012 17:37 schrieb "Michael Süess" <michael.sue...@basis06.ch>: > I use vm (or seda) with ?multipleConsumers=true to implement a > request-reply observer pattern: > > > <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> > <beans > xmlns="http://www.**springframework.org/schema/**beans<http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans> > " > > xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/**2001/XMLSchema-instance<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance> > " > > xmlns:camel="http://camel.**apache.org/schema/spring<http://camel.apache.org/schema/spring> > " > xsi:schemaLocation=" > > http://www.springframework.**org/schema/beans<http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans> > http://www.springframework.**org/schema/beans/spring-beans.**xsd<http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans/spring-beans.xsd> > > http://camel.apache.org/**schema/spring<http://camel.apache.org/schema/spring> > http://camel.apache.org/**schema/spring/camel-spring.xsd<http://camel.apache.org/schema/spring/camel-spring.xsd> > **"> > <camelContext > xmlns="http://camel.apache.**org/schema/spring<http://camel.apache.org/schema/spring> > "> > <route id="subject"> > <from uri="file:data/spike/in?noop=**true"/> > <log message="starting file '${header.CamelFileName}' ..."/> > <to uri="vm:subjectStarted" pattern="InOut"/> > <log message="file '${header.CamelFileName}' done"/> > </route> > > <route id="subjectListener1"> > <from uri="vm:subjectStarted?**multipleConsumers=true"/> > <log message=" starting file '${header.CamelFileName}' ..."/> > <log message=" file '${header.CamelFileName}' done"/> > </route> > > <route id="subjectListener2"> > <from uri="vm:subjectStarted?**multipleConsumers=true"/> > <log message=" starting file '${header.CamelFileName}' ..."/> > <log message=" file '${header.CamelFileName}' done"/> > </route> > </camelContext> > </beans> > > when running this sample i always got an ExchangeTimedOutException > although all listeners have finished before the timeout. > > Any ideas? >
