On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 6:08 PM, James Carman <ja...@carmanconsulting.com> wrote: > What happens if you have a "poisonous" (just plain bad) message on the queue > and not a system outage? You'll continually put the message back on the > queue (by rolling back your transaction) and retry it, thereby blocking all > the subsequent messages in the queue. Right? >
Yes, but a broker usually have a way to configure a upper cap, and move the poisonous message to a DLQ. This is broker specific and you need to read up on what your broker support. > -- > View this message in context: > http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Transacted-vs-DeadLetterQueue-tp5713992p5714078.html > Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Claus Ibsen ----------------- FuseSource Email: cib...@fusesource.com Web: http://fusesource.com Twitter: davsclaus, fusenews Blog: http://davsclaus.com Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen
