On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 1:30 PM, Marco Crivellaro <marco.cr...@gmail.com> wrote: > Is there a chance dinamic timeout can be added in a future version? > I suppose it can be done provided the fact it is avaliable in aggregation. >
The logic for timeout in aggregate vs recipient list / multicast / etc is not the same. The latter will require a change in the DSL to let people specify dynamic expressions for the timeout. As well it requires to store state about the timeout as each exchange can have a different value etc. All together its not so easy. But feel free to create a JIRA ticket. > > Is there a way to make use of completionTimeout of the aggregation strategy? > No not on the recipient list EIP. You can use both EIPs and have dynamic completion timeout on the aggregator. > -- > View this message in context: > http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/recipientList-aggregationStrategy-and-completionTimeout-tp5714917p5714921.html > Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Claus Ibsen ----------------- FuseSource Email: cib...@fusesource.com Web: http://fusesource.com Twitter: davsclaus, fusenews Blog: http://davsclaus.com Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen
