Thanks Claus - that was just what I was looking for. On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 1:15 PM, Claus Ibsen <claus.ib...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi > > Kai Wahner did a presentation recently at CamelOne where he covered > Camel and Activiti. > > The video is here > > http://fusesource.com/apache-camel-conference-2012/camelone_speakers_2012/#kwahner > > > > On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 2:01 PM, chris snow <chsnow...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Forum, > > > > My Company is trying to push Activiti for all orchestration, but I think > > the decision isn't that simple. Both technologies have their place > > depending on the problem that needs solving. > > > > Is there any criteria that will help me choose between Activiti and > Camel, > > (or even Activiti + Camel) for orchestration? As a starter (imho): > > > > - Camel is better suited for: > > > > Stateless orchestrations (Activiti has un-necessary database persistence > > overhead) > > Enterprise Integration (Activiti integration is largely done in java > code) > > Technical Orchestrations > > etc > > > > - Activiti is better suited for: > > > > Processes that require human interaction (Camel requires lots of coding > for > > this) > > Business Orchestrations > > etc > > > > Any pointers will be appreciated!! > > > > Many thanks in advance, > > > > Chris > > > > -- > Claus Ibsen > ----------------- > FuseSource > Email: cib...@fusesource.com > Web: http://fusesource.com > Twitter: davsclaus, fusenews > Blog: http://davsclaus.com > Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen > -- Chris Snow - http://uk.linkedin.com/pub/christopher-snow-mba-tech-mgmt/6/0/316
